That policy, however, only provided UIM coverage to people defined as “insureds”. In this case, since the named insured was a corporation, the policy specified that only individuals “occupying” a covered vehicle at the time of the incident qualified. The contract defined “occupying” as being “in, upon, getting in, on, out or off” a covered vehicle. ACE denied the claim on the basis that Rahimzadeh, on a bicycle, did not meet the definition.
ACE Insurance defeats employee UIM claim in federal appeals court
- Niki Wilson
Recent Company News
- E-Claim.com Successful Second Round in the Edward Lowe Foundation’s SIG Program
- E-Claim.com Welcomes Lozano Insurance Adjusters: A New Era of Claims Management with ClickClaims
- ClickClaims Recognized as One of the Top Insurtech Companies – Global 5-Star Technology and Software Providers for 2023 by Insurance Business America
- Heartwarming Acts of Kindness Multiply: E-Claim Employee Efforts Result in $9,000 for Smile Train!
- 2021 Louisiana Growth Leaders: Spotlight on E-Claim | Louisiana Economic Development
Recent Blog Posts
- Florida Carriers: Are You Meeting SB-76 Reporting Requirements?
- Thomas Brown, Founder & CEO of E-Claim.com Featured LIVE on Tea Time with Tech Founders Podcast
- Maximizing Every Minute: The Real Game-Changer in Life and Work
- ClickClaims and the Future of AI
- Fighting Fraud from the AIr and in the Courts
Recent Industry News
- California Department of Insurance Completes Final Review of Wildfire Model
- Floodbase Launches U.S. Flood Mapping With Per-Event Access
- Amazon Faces UK Lawsuits Worth up to $5.4B From Retailers, Consumers
- Driverless Cars Are Changing the Future of Claims
- Edison Sets Up Compensation Program for Victims of LA’s Eaton Fire